Eclipse Announces MicroLip™ Prototype Program

Cliff • June 11, 2020

While we have had some manufacturing downtime during the COVID-19 pandemic, we’ve been working on finding solutions to issues that our customers have brought to the table over the past few years.

We’ve sent many new designs into testing, and have been focusing on processes that will help improve productivity and lower costs.

The MicroLip ™is an example of a viable solution to rotary seal issues that our customers have struggled with. This is especially true when the order volumes are relatively low or the shaft diameters are small, such as with encoders or chemical-processing facilities.

The Eclipse MicroLip™Prototype Program

When moving from rubber to Teflon lip seals , we found that the cost to bring the product to market is often a hindrance. The high cost is due to tooling, and the number of pieces that must be manufactured to make the product viable in the prototype phase.

Because of this, many of our customers limp along using inappropriately-applied rubber lip seals to solve rotary seal problems.

MicroLip™seals have proven to be a powerful component in rotary services. Since the MicroLip’s inception, it has been applied to a variety of applications including mobile hydraulics, robotics, surgical drills, and semiconductor processing and encoders.

Over the last 3 years, Eclipse has designed and manufactured various styles of MicroLips in diameter sizes of under 1/8 inch (5mm) and over an inch. Since the components of the MicroLip™can be machined, we’ve made the seal in quantities of less than 10, and batches in the thousands.

Eclipse Engineering is making a series of components from 1/8-inch shaft up to 1-inch shaft in fractional increments. The series will include the inside spacer, so we’ll only need to machine a Teflon lip to shape, assemble, and add a spring if necessary.

The concept of our MicroLip™Prototype Program is the brainchild of Doug Montgomery and Chris Gruner, Eclipse Engineering’s design and development team. This concept will help our customers make quicker decisions at a reduced cost, with less time to prototype and bring your product to market.

If the concept is successful, we can leave the design as is, and produce to your specifications (or consider refining the design to fit all your design criteria).

This approach will allow us to rapidly prototype the MicroLip™into your application, without the major cost and time needed to validate a Teflon lip for our customers’ application.

The Benefits of the MicroLip™

The MicroLip™typically uses a precision-machined case with retaining ring, and a precision-machined Polymer lip. The seal also incorporates the ability to spring load the lip to better handle any eccentric movement of the shaft.

Typical spring loads include garter, canted coil, and elastomer (such as an O-ring ). This proven design has operated at pressures in excess of 200 PSI, and speeds in excess of 3000 RPM. 

Rubber lip seals are very successful when the pressures are 10 psi and lower, often performing best at zero to just a couple of PSI. And in the right configuration, Teflon-style lip seals are capable of pressures of up to over 500 PSI and very high rotational speeds (while ensuring the speed doesn’t exceed the PV limits of the material).

Standard lip seals or rubber lip seals are traditionally not capable of being manufactured at diameters down to .125 inch or lower. But the MicroLip™is capable of very small diameters.

Having the ability to custom manufacture a lip with a specified spring load allows the customer to control the loading on the lip and still handle eccentricities due to shaft mis-alignment. The key to making this in small volumes allows a viable, cost-effective solution.

The flexibility of varying seal materials and spring loads allows our customers to seal on a variety of shaft materials and, depending on eccentricity, what kind of spring load will be needed to continue to seal.

We’re pleased to offer this stocking solution to our customers. Our goal is to dramatically shorten lead times with attractive prototype pricing, allowing these products to be evaluated by our customers.

By Doug Montgomery • October 21, 2026
When designing a successful sealing system, factors such as leakage control, wear resistance, and seal material selection often receive the most attention. However, another critical component can have just as much influence on performance: the seal gland. A seal gland, also referred to as a groove, is the space within the hardware that houses and retains a seal. Its design affects not only how the seal functions but also how easily it can be installed, removed, or replaced. Different seal materials and configurations require different gland designs. For example, an elastic O-Ring may be relatively easy to install in a solid gland, while a PTFE spring-energized seal may require a split or stepped configuration to prevent damage during installation. Understanding the different types of seal glands is essential when selecting a sealing solution. Below, we'll explore four common gland designs, their advantages and limitations, and the seals best suited for each. What Are the Four Main Types of Seal Glands? The four common types of seal glands used in rod and piston sealing applications are solid, open, split, and stepped glands. Each offers different benefits depending on the seal material, installation requirements, and hardware configuration. Solid glands feature a simple rectangular groove and are commonly used with O-Rings and certain O-Ring energized PTFE seals. Open glands allow seals to be installed directly into a counterbore and are typically best suited for metal-cased seals, including rotary lip seals and cased spring energized seals. Split glands use a removable retaining component to simplify seal installation, removal, and maintenance. They are particularly useful for spring energized seals and applications requiring frequent seal replacement. Stepped glands incorporate a small retaining step that secures the seal without additional hardware. They are often used in spring energized sealing applications where a one-piece hardware design is preferred. Choosing between these designs involves balancing installation requirements, manufacturing complexity, and long-term seal performance. Solid Glands
By Doug Montgomery • September 14, 2026
Compare Crimped Case Seals and traditional componentized rotary lip seals, including their advantages, limitations, costs, and ideal applications.
By Doug Montgomery • August 26, 2026
Learn the advantages and limitations of Channel Seals, including friction, wear life, PTFE performance, machining requirements, and dynamic sealing considerations.
CIP Spring Seal Silicone
By Doug Montgomery • July 15, 2026
Learn how Clean-in-Place (CIP) seals improve sanitation, reduce downtime, and support FDA-compliant sealing applications in food, pharmaceutical, and industrial equipment.