Best Sealing Materials for Epoxy Resin

Cliff • February 19, 2020

Sealing viscous fluids like epoxy resins requires a seal that contains enough force to ensure a good scraping action, while not overloading the shaft you’re trying to seal. This is often accomplished by selecting the best spring that will continue to be reactive, regardless of the fluid.

This means selecting a spring material that can successfully handle the following challenges:

  • Maintain a sharp edge to ensure a good scraping action
  • Ensure no fluid will pass under the lip
  • Exhibit a relatively low coefficient of friction
  • Won’t damage the shaft due to high unit loading
  • Won’t contaminate the chemical reaction when used in combination of a mixing head for two part mixers

Temperature is sometimes also a factor in sealing, which means some seal materials aren’t suitable for these tasks. And of course, the chemistry of the fluids can’t interact with the spring or the seal.

The seal must be rigid enough to stand up to all the above conditions, and at the same time be flexible enough to be installed, and reactive to some side-loadings.

Best Seal Material for Sealing Epoxy Resins

We generally turn to two different seal materials: PTFE or Teflon , and UHMW or Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene.

There are many differences between these two materials. The UHMW tends to be very stiff, and thereby does an excellent job of scraping. However, it’s often limited by temperature, and some fluids can react with it, although most epoxy resins don’t interact with UHMW.

On the other hand, Teflon is far more compliant than UHMW, has a broader temperature range, and chemical resistance is almost never an issue (especially with epoxy resins).

So how do you choose which seal material will work best for your needs? The answer boils down to a few factors: Temperature, which relates to speed (especially in rotary applications), and how well the seal will scrape off the shaft.

Speed in Epoxy Seals

Teflon performs better at high speed. But UHMW holds an edge better, which means it ultimately does a better job at scraping.

Springs are generally not an issue, as few chemicals in epoxy resins will affect stainless steels. But the type of spring you use is very important. You can expect that the fluid will completely cover the spring, so the spring force needs to stay unaffected by metallic springs.

The cantilever spring generally offers the best solution, as it allows the fluid in and out of the spring cavity, where other springs tend to hold the fluid, thereby affecting the overall spring force.

The cantilever cavity can be filled with silicone to close off the cavity. This keeps the viscous fluid from impacting the performance of the spring in the application.

Beyond a cantilever spring, other types of energizers tend to not do as good a job in overall performance. This includes O-rings , which are often affected by the fluid, or round springs like Helical , which tend to trap the fluid in the spring cavity.

Fillers for Epoxy Resin Seals

There are fillers that we apply to UHMW to enhance the performance and extend the life. They generally cost a bit more to produce, as they wear tools and could impact the shaft finish and wear life.

Teflon is always an excellent choice with the correct fillers selected. But again, Teflon doesn’t hold an edge for scraping.

While Teflon and UHMW are great choices for sealing and spring materials, these aren’t interchangeable due to the nature of the polymers and the desired result.

If we seal after the two-part epoxy is mixed (prior to leaving the head), we need to be prepared to clean or flush the seal quickly (prior to the compound hardening in place). Our selected seal material must be able to stand up to some of the harshest cleaning fluids and resist chemical break down during the cleaning process.

Rotary Applications for Epoxy Seals

Rotary applications are both easier and more difficult. We often see rotary during a mixing process, and Teflon will handle the increased shaft temperature much better than UHMW. And without the reciprocating action, the rotary seal only needs to provide enough downward force to not allow the fluids to push up the lip during operation.

The reciprocating action tends to want to draw or drag fluid past the seal. That’s why the edge and force on UHMW works so well. Whereas in rotary, no fluid is being drug under the lip, so penetration of the boundary is much more difficult.
Eclipse has designed seals at less than .062 inch (1.5mm) for many reciprocating applications with various types of seal materials to accommodate size, installation and operation of the Epoxy Pump mechanism.

We have also designed a series of rotary seals, all of which can be CIP or clean-in-place sealing elements.

By Doug Montgomery April 17, 2025
Discover how Eclipse Engineering optimized seal design for high-pressure CO₂ extraction, addressing extrusion gaps and wear ring exposure challenges.
Learn how Eclipse solved manufacturing challenges for micro spring-energized seals
By Doug Montgomery March 21, 2025
Learn how Eclipse solved manufacturing challenges for micro spring-energized seals, optimizing sealing performance in epoxy dispensing equipment.
By Doug Montgomery February 13, 2025
Learn how Eclipse Seal’s custom spring energized ball seats with angled grooves improve performance
By Doug Montgomery January 17, 2025
Eclipse deals regularly with challenging sealing applications from all industries. High pressures and speeds create unique sets of conditions where seal design and material properties are pushed to the limit. While reciprocating applications can certainly test seals to the edge of capability, often times rotary applications can present the greatest challenge to seal integrity and wear life. Unlike reciprocating configurations where the seal is acting on a different part of the shaft or bore throughout it’s operating range, rotary seals must operate on the same sealing area continuously. This makes things like heat rejection much more difficult, especially in unlubricated or dry running applications. Extreme localized heating can have negative affect on both seal and hardware life. Rotary applications also pose sealing difficulties due to the simple fact that surface speeds can be much higher than in reciprocating systems. A simple electric motor can operate at very high rpm, while long stroke, high speed reciprocating machinery is a major piece of equipment that is far less common (though Eclipse also has sealing solutions in a number of these situations). A customer approached Eclipse with an application that was beyond the scope and capability of any standard, off-the-shelf rotary seal. This sealing system would require a combination of both wear resistance in high-speed rotary, as well as excellent leakage control and sealability. Two factors that, more often than not, work in opposition to each other. The Customer Issue The customer was developing a test system that required an electric motor shaft passed through the wall of a large vacuum chamber. The testing apparatus needed a sizable motor to meet the speed and torque requirements. Adapting the motor to operate inside the chamber would not be practical due to contamination and motor cooling concerns. Therefore, the motor would have to be placed outside the chamber and a driveshaft would have to go through the chamber wall. Which, of course, would need a seal. Operating Conditions:
 Rotary Shaft Seal
 Shaft Diameter: 2.5”
 RPM: 7,500 RPM - unlubricated
 Pressure: Vacuum internal side / 1 ATM external side Temperature: 40° - 90°F The customer knew any kind of off-the-shelf rotary seal with a rubber element would not last any amount of time in the combination of speed and a dry running condition. They also knew a single lip PTFE seal would likely not meet their leakage requirements. Therefore, they turned Eclipse for a custom sealing solution.